Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Critical Reasoning (Vol. III), Question #46.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:05 am
Posts: 35
This question asks the following by citing a passage here below: "The statement [below], if true, most strongly support which one of the following?"

"The purpose of general theory of art is to explain every aesthetic feature that is found in any of the arts. Pre-modern general theories of art, however, focused primarily on painting and sculpture. Every pre-modern general theory of art, even those that succeed as theories of painting and sculpture, fails to explain some aesthetic feature of music"

(A) Any general theory of art that explains the aesthetic features of painting also explains those of sculpture.

(B) A general theory of art that explains every aesthetic feature of music will achieve its purpose.

(C) Any theory of art that focuses primarily on sculpture and painting cannot explain every aesthetic feature of music.

(D) No pre-modern general theory of art achieves its purpose unless music is not art.

(E) No pre-modern general theory of art explains any aesthetic features of music that are not shared with painting and sculpture.

I incorrectly answered (C), and I cannot understand why my choice is a trap. I am unconvinced that (D) is that answer because (C) clearly restates the logical conclusion that is supported by evidence. I suspect that the use of double-negatives is hampering my understanding of (D) as the correct answer, yet I still feel that (C) is more logical. Could you please help me understand what is at issue here? :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Critical Reasoning (Vol. III), Question #46.
PostPosted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:32 pm
Posts: 497
First, the passage tells us that the "purpose of a a general theory of art" is to explain EVERY feature found in ANY of the arts...
There are two extremes here - "every feature" and "any of the arts."
Also notice that we're talking about a "general theory of art" not just a "theory of art."

In C, we talk about a "theory of art" instead of a "general theory," and that it says that it CANNOT explain both -- We don't know that it cannot, only that we don't have a general theory yet that actually DOES.

In D, we say that the theory doesn't succeed unless we exclude music - which works with the passage.

Does this help some??

Veritas Help


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron