The post Read the Last Piece First on the GMAT! appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>However, when it comes to the GMAT, I am quite content to ruin the suspense of a question in favor of deriving a more convenient and efficient means of solving it. Interestingly, it turns out that when a question offers multiple bits of information, starting with the last piece can often be a way of dramatically simplifying the problem.

Take the following problem that a tutoring student of mine encountered on her GMATPrep test:

*Mary’s income is 60 percent more than Tim’s income, and Tim’s income is 40% less than Juan’s income. What percent of Juan’s income is Mary’s income?*

*A) **124%*

*B) **120%*

*C) **96%*

*D) **80%*

*E) **64%*

She approached the question like many test-takers would: she started with the first piece of information, and called Mary’s income $100. And then she got stuck. She realized that Tim’s income isn’t $40 here, as $100 is more than double $40, so clearly Mary’s income would not then be 60% greater than Tim’s (though Tim’s would have been 60% *less* than Mary’s.) So then, I suggested, why not start at the end?

The last person mentioned here is Juan, so let’s call Juan’s income $100. She then knocked out the remaining calculations in about 30 seconds. If Juan’s income is $100, and Tim’s income is 40% less than Juan’s, than Tim’s income would be $60. And if Tim’s income is $60, and Mary’s income is 60% more than Tim’s, Mary’s income would be 60 + 60% of 60 = 60 + 36 = 96. (Or 1.6 * 60 = 96.) If Mary’s income is $96 and Juan’s is $100, then clearly, Mary’s income is 96% of Juan’s, and the answer is C. Not bad.

Let’s try it again on another question:

*In a certain region, the number of children who have been vaccinated against rubella is twice the number who have been vaccinated against mumps. The number who have been vaccinated against both is twice the number who have been vaccinated only against mumps. If 5000 have been vaccinated against both, how many have been vaccinated only against rubella?*

*A) **2500*

*B) **7500*

*C) **10000*

*D) **15000*

*E) **17500*

First, note that this is a classic overlapping sets questions, so let’s set up a simple matrix:

But now, let’s start by inserting the last piece of information we’re given. 5000 have been vaccinated against both, so that goes in the Mumps/Rubella Vaccine cell. Now we’ve got:

Next, we’ll work backwards. We’re told that the number that have been vaccinated against both (5000) is twice the number that have been vaccinated against only mumps. So the number that have been vaccinated against only mumps must be 2500. Now our table looks like this:

Now we know that 7500 people have been vaccinated against Mumps. Last, we’re told that the number vaccinated against Rubella is twice the number that have been vaccinated against Mumps, which means that 15,000 people have been vaccinated against Rubella. If 15,000 total have been vaccinated against Rubella, and 5000 of those have been vaccinated against both, then, according to our table, 10,000 have been vaccinated against only Rubella. So C is our answer.

Takeaway: The GMAT question writer is going to provide information to you in a very strategic way. If the most useful piece of info comes at the end of a lengthier question, the question will be harder if you start at the beginning. So be like my zany grad school teacher and start at the end. It may ruin the suspense, but as a consolation, you’re more likely to get the question right, and I’m guessing that’s a trade-off most of us are more than happy to make.

*GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council.

Plan on taking the GMAT soon? We have GMAT prep courses starting all the time. And, be sure to find us on Facebook, YouTube and Google+, and follow us on Twitter!

*By David Goldstein, a Veritas Prep GMAT instructor based in Boston. You can find more articles by him here.*

The post Read the Last Piece First on the GMAT! appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post The GMAT Quant Decimal Trend You NEED to Know appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>But then you see a question like this:

*Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?*

*A) 10/189*

*B) 15/196*

*C) 16/225*

*D) 25/144*

*E) 39/128*

Once you spend a little time trying to divide 10 by 189, you realize that the question is going to be incredibly painful and time-consuming if you have to keep applying this approach until you find a fraction that results in a terminating decimal. So let’s be mindful of the fact that the purpose of the GMAT is not to test one’s facility for engaging in tedious arithmetic, but rather to assess our ability to recognize patterns under pressure.

Generally speaking, the best way to uncover a pattern is to use simple numbers first and then extrapolate our results to the more complex scenario we’re tasked with evaluating. We already established above that ½ is a terminating decimal and 1/3 is not. Let’s continue in that vein and see what we find (terminating decimals are in bold):

**½ = .5**

1/3 = .3333…

**¼ = .25**

**1/5 = .2**

1/6 = .166666…

1/7= .142857…

**1/8 = .125**

1/9 = .1111

**1/10 = .1**

Next, let’s examine our terminating decimal expressions and see if these numbers have any elements in common. Each of these fractions, it turns out, has a denominator whose prime factorization is composed solely of two prime bases, 2 or 5 or both. This turns out to be a general principle: if a fraction has been simplified, and the prime factorization of the denominator can be expressed in the form of 2^x * 5^y where x and y are non-negative integers, the fraction can be expressed as a terminating decimal.

Now back to our question. We can rephrase the question to be, “Which of the following denominators has a prime factorization that consists solely of 2’s or 5’s or both?”

Not bad. That certainly makes life a little easier. But before we dive in and begin taking prime factorizations with reckless abandon, let’s think like the test-maker. There is no way to do this question without working with the answer choices. Most test-takers will begin with A and work their way down. If you’re trying to create a difficult time-consuming question, where would you bury the correct answer? Probably towards D or E. So when we encounter this kind of scenario, we’re better off if we start at the bottom and work our way up.

E) 39/128. The denominator is 128, which has a prime factorization of 2^7. Because the denominator consists solely of 2’s, this fraction, when expressed as a decimal, must terminate. We’re done. E is the answer. (Intuitively, this makes sense, as all we’re really doing is cutting our numerator in half seven times.) Much easier than doing long division.

Before we commit this principle to memory, let’s make sure that it will be helpful in other contexts. After all, the rule that unlocks a single question won’t be terribly useful to us. So here is the same concept utilized in a Data Sufficiency question:

*Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 24, 0.82, and 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal? *

*(1) 90 < r < 100 *

*(2) s = 4 *

Notice how much easier this question is if we rephrase it as “if r/s is in its most simplified form, does the prime factorization of the denominator consist entirely of 2’s or 5’s?”

Statement 1 can’t be sufficient on its own, as it tells us nothing about the denominator. 91/2 is a terminating decimal, for example, but 91/3 is not.

Statement 2 tells us that the denominator is 4, or 2^2. If we’ve internalized our terminating decimal rule, we see right away that this must be sufficient, as *anything* dividing by 4 will result in a terminating decimal. The answer is B, Statement 2 alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Takeaway: When studying for the GMAT, it can feel as though there are an infinite number of rules, axioms, and formulas to memorize. Our job, when preparing, is to find the rules that are applicable in multiple contexts and internalize those. If we encounter a problem that seems unusually time-consuming, and no rule springs to mind, we can derive the necessary pattern on the spot by working with simple numbers.

**GMATPrep question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council.*

Plan on taking the GMAT soon? We have GMAT prep courses starting all the time. And, be sure to find us on Facebook, YouTube and Google+, and follow us on Twitter!

*By David Goldstein, a Veritas Prep GMAT instructor based in Boston. You can find more articles by him here.*

The post The GMAT Quant Decimal Trend You NEED to Know appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post 6 Simple Steps to Attack Critical Reasoning Questions on the GMAT appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>This can be difficult because several of the answers can appear attractive. Keep in mind, however, that for Inference questions, the correct answer **must be true**. Answers that are “likely to be true” or “could be true” based on the information provided in the stimulus seem attractive at first, but if they are not true 100% of the time, in every situation, then they are not the correct answer.

Another difficulty in approaching Inference questions is that with the many of the other question types (Strengthen, Weaken, etc.), your job is to select the answer that includes new information that either undermines or supports the conclusion. For Inference questions, you do not want to bring in information that is not in the stimulus. All of the information required to answer the question will be included in the stimulus.

Here is a 6-step approach that can help you to efficiently attack GMAT Critical Reasoning Inference questions:

**1) Read the question stem first**.

This will allow you quickly categorize the type of Critical Reasoning question (Strengthen, Weaken, Inference, etc.) and let you focus on identifying the premises in the stimulus. Questions such as, “Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the statements above?” and, “If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?” signify that you are dealing with an Inference question.

**2) Speculate what you think the correct conclusion is**.

Sometimes this may be difficult to verbalize, but having an outline or framework of what the “must be true” answer should include will help to eliminate some answer choices.

**3) Evaluate the answer choices using your speculated answer**.

You want to carefully read all 5 answer choices. As you read the answers, compare them to the answer, or the outline of the answer, you speculated. Some answers are obviously incorrect – either they are too narrow in scope, too extreme to be always be true, or do not follow the criteria laid out in the stimulus. Eliminate these answers. For other answer choices that seem attractive, keep them as possibilities. Once you have read all of the answer choices, you can then compare your list of possible answers using the criteria that the correct answer must be always be true.

**4) Become a Defense Lawyer**.

When comparing your list of possible answers, try to come up with plausible scenarios that would prove the answer being considered not true. Just because the stimulus says that “everyone sitting in the dentist’s office waiting room at 9:00 a.m. was a patient” does not necessarily mean that they were waiting for an appointment. Some could have already finished their appointment, and some could have been there dropping off another patient. Like a defense lawyer, you need to find every every scenario in which an answer choice might not be true in order to eliminate it from your options.

**5) Be aware of exaggerated or extreme answers**.

Because the correct answer must always be true, modifiers that exaggerate an element of the premise or make an extreme claim usually signify an incorrect answer. If the stimulus says, “Some of the widgets produced by Company X were defective,” an attractive, yet incorrect answer choice may exaggerate this statement with a modifier such as “most” by claiming, “Most of Company X’s widgets were found to be defective.” Furthermore, answers that include the terms “always”, “never”, “none” and the like are good indicators that the answer will not be true 100% of the time.

**6) Be aware of answers that change the scope of the stimulus**.

On more difficult Inference questions (as if they were not difficult enough), the test makers will tempt you to select an answer choice that slightly changes an element of the facts laid out in the stimulus. For example, the stimulus might discuss the decrease in the violent crime rate in City A over a certain time period.

The attractive answer that follows all of the elements of having to be true 100% of the time, but is still incorrect might discuss decrease in the murder rate of City A over that time period. While the answer would seem to fit the bill, the murder rate is not the same as the rate of violent crime – this changes the scope of the initial stimulus and we can therefore rule that answer out.

The correct inference or conclusion on Critical Reasoning Inference questions is very close to what is stated explicitly in the stimulus. Remember, the right answer choice on these question types must be true 100% of the time.

Plan on taking the GMAT soon? We have GMAT prep courses starting all the time. And, be sure to find us on Facebook, YouTube and Google+, and follow us on Twitter!

By Dennis Cashion, a Veritas Prep instructor based in Denver.

The post 6 Simple Steps to Attack Critical Reasoning Questions on the GMAT appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post How to Use the Answer Choices to Solve GMAT Quant Problems appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>Take for example, the following question:

**If 3 ^{x}4^{y }= 177,147 and x – y = 11, then x =?**

A) Undefined

B) 0

C) 11

D) 177,136

E) 177,158

Where do we begin here? 177,147 is a large (not familiar) number and there are not one, but two exponents in the equation. Looking at the answer choices, we can see that D and E cannot be the answer as they are too large, so at least now we have a starting point. Additionally, we can see that our choices come down to some mixture of x and y, all y, or all x.

If x = 0, then we can say that 177, 147 is not divisible by 3 and is divisible by 4, so checking the divisibility rule is the ticket! Knowing that to be divisible by 4, the last two digits must be divisible by 4, we can see that 177,147 is not divisible by 4, so 4^{y}** ^{ }**becomes irrelevant and we realize y must equal 0. The sum of the digits of 177, 147 is 27, which is divisible by 3, so we can see that the 3

Answer choices are little used resources by GMAT test takers. In the heat of battle, we become so focused on solving the problems in front of us that we forget to utilize all of the information at our disposal. Another way the answer choices can help you is by plugging them back into the problem to see if they work.

This “back-plugging” is useful when the problem to be solved is algebraic in nature and the answer choices are numbers (not variables). You may find it is easier on a certain problem to arithmetically calculate 2, 3 or even 5 answers by plugging in the answer choices, than in creating and manipulating a complex algebraic equation. In these cases, plugging in answer choice C first will help you to eliminate up to 60% of the answers on the first calculation.

Many times, just understanding what the correct answer should “look like” by employing some reasoning on the front end will allow you to eliminate some, if not all of the incorrect answers. Consider this problem:

**((-1.9)(o.6) – (2.6)(1.2))/6.0 = ?**

A) -0.71

B) 1.00

C) 1.07

D) 1.71

E) 2.71

This is not a difficult problem by any measure, and some test takers will not hesitate to jump in and begin multiplying and dividing decimals. However, by spending a little bit of time looking at the big picture of this problem, an astute test taker would see that the answer must be negative. The first term is negative and we are subtracting a larger number from it. Therefore, the correct answer must be A.

So, instead of jumping in and crunching numbers on the GMAT, you can save yourself some time and brain power by using the answer choices to assist you in reasoning your way to the correct answer – or at least in eliminating several of the incorrect answers.

By Dennis Cashion, a Veritas Prep instructor based in Denver.

The post How to Use the Answer Choices to Solve GMAT Quant Problems appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post Min/Max Questions on the GMAT are a Piece of Cake (or Pie)! appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>I’m talking specifically about min/max questions. For these problems, there are only two things we need to do. First, we need to determine the size of the pie. Then, if we’re trying to maximize one slice, we need to minimize the size of all the other slices and see what’s left over. Similarly, if we’re trying to minimize one slice, we need to maximize all the other slices. Let’s see this principle in action with an official question:

*Five pieces of wood have an average length (arithmetic mean) of 124 centimeters and a median length of 140 centimeters. What is the maximum length, in centimeters, of the shortest piece of wood? *

*A) 90 *

*B) 100 *

*C) 110 *

*D) 130 *

*E) 140*

First, let’s determine the size of the pie. If the average is 124 centimeters, and there are five pieces of wood, we know that the total sum of all the pieces of wood would be 5*124 = 620. Let’s call the smallest piece, ’s.’ So far, we have the following:

s ___, 140, ___, ___

Next, we want to maximize the smallest piece. Think pie. If I want to maximize the size of one piece, in this case ‘s,’ I want to minimize the size of all the other slices. The minimum size for the second smallest slice is ‘s.’ (If it were any smaller, it would be the smallest slice.) The minimum size for our two larges slices is 140. (If those were any smaller, the median would change.)

Now, we’re left with the following set:

s, s, 140, 140, 140.

Well, we already know that the sum is 620, so now we have the following equation:

s + s + 140 + 140 + 140 = 620.

2s + 420 = 620

2s = 200

s = 100. The answer is B.

Let’s try a tougher one:

*For a certain race, 3 teams were allowed to enter 3 members each. A team earned 6 – n points whenever one of its members finished in nth place, where **1 ≤ n ≤ 5. *

*There were no ties, disqualifications, or withdrawals. If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?*

*A) 0*

*B) 1*

*C) 2*

*D) 3*

*E) 4*

We know it’s a min/max question, so first we need to determine the size of the pie. We’re told that a team will earn 6 – n points whenever one of its members finishes in nth place. The team that has the first place finisher (n = 1) will earn 6 – 1 = 5 points. The second place finisher (n =2) will earn 6 – 2 = 4 points. The trend quickly becomes clear:

First place: 5 points

Second place: 4 points

Third place: 3 points

Fourth place: 2 points

Fifth place: 1 point

One of the conditions of the problem is that ‘n’ cannot be any larger than 5, so at this point, there are no more points to earn. Summing all the available points, we get 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15. So there are 15 points total for the three teams to divvy up.

Now we’re trying to minimize the number of points one team earned. What did we do in the Goldstein household when we were feeling particularly sadistic and wished to stick my youngest brother with the smallest possible piece of pie? We’d maximize the size of all the other pieces, leaving the youngest, most vulnerable Goldstein with a sad pile of unpalatable mush. Let’s do the same here.

We’re told that no team scored more than 6 points, so 6 is the max number of points a team could have earned. If two teams earned the max – 6 points – they’d have earned 12 points between them. If there are 15 points total, and two of the teams earn a total of 12 points, that leaves 3 points for the stragglers. D is the answer.

Takeaway: As soon as you see a min/max term such as “least,” “most,” “minimum,” “or “maximum,” you’ll be well-served to summon some traumatic memories of divvying up your favorite childhood dessert.

**GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council.*

*By David Goldstein, a Veritas Prep GMAT instructor based in Boston. You can find more articles by him here.*

The post Min/Max Questions on the GMAT are a Piece of Cake (or Pie)! appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post Strategies for the New GMAT Questions that You Need to Know! appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>My concern as an instructor is whether the philosophy I’m advocating and the techniques I’m teaching are as relevant for the newer questions as they have been for the older ones.

This philosophy can be summarized as follows: the GMAT is not, fundamentally, a content-based test, but rather, uses certain elements of our academic background to test how we think under pressure. Because the test is evaluating how we think, and not what we know, the cultivation of simple strategies, such as using the answer choices or picking easy numbers, is just as important as the re-mastery of the content you may have initially learned in eighth grade, but have subsequently forgotten.

Having thoroughly dissected the new questions in the latest version of the Official Guide, I can confidently report that this philosophy is more relevant than ever. Of the over 200 new quantitative questions, I didn’t do extensive calculations for a single problem. If anything, the kind of fluid logic-based approach that we preach at Veritas is more critical than ever.

Take this new question, for example:

*Four extra-large sandwiches of exactly the same size were ordered for m students, where m > 4. Three of the sandwiches were evenly divided among the students. Since 4 students did not want any of the fourth sandwich, it was evenly divided among the remaining students. If Carol ate one piece from each of the four sandwiches, the amount of sandwich that she ate would be what fraction of a whole extra-large sandwich? *

*A) (m+4)/[m(m-4)]
B) (2m-4)/[m(m-4)]
C) (4m-4)/[m(m-4)]
D) (4m-8)/[m(m-4)]
E) (4m-12)/[m(m-4)]*

Of course, we could do this question algebraically. But if the GMAT is testing our ability to make good decisions under pressure, and if the algebra feels hard for you, then a better option is to make your life as easy as possible and select a simple number for m. If m is larger than 4, let’s say that m = 5. “m” represents the number of students, so now we have 5 students and, we’re told in the question stem, a total of 4 sandwiches. (The question of what kind of negligent, hard-hearted school knowingly packs only 4 sandwiches for all of its students to share will have to be addressed in another post. This question feels straight out of *Oliver Twist.*)

Okay. We’re told that 3 of the sandwiches are divided evenly among the 5 students. (3 sandwiches)/(5 students) means each student gets 3/5 of a sandwich.

Additionally, we’re told that 4 of the students don’t want any part of the remaining sandwich. Because we only have 5 students and 4 of them don’t want the remaining sandwich, the last student will get the entire fourth sandwich.

To summarize what we have so far: Each of the 5 students initially received 3/5 of a sandwich, and then one student received an entire additional sandwich, on top of that initial 3/5. The lucky fifth student received a total of 3/5 + 1 = 8/5 of a sandwich.

Last, we ‘re told that Carol ate a piece of each of the four sandwiches. But we established that only one student ate a piece of every sandwich, so Carol has to be that lucky student! Therefore, Carol ate 8/5 of a sandwich.

We’re asked what fraction of a sandwich Carol ate, so the answer is simply 8/5. Now all we have to do is plug ‘5’ in place of ‘m’ in each answer choice, and the one that gives us 8/5 will be our answer.

Most test-takers will simply start with A and work their way down until they find an option that works. The question-writer knows that this is how most test-takers proceed. Therefore, it’s a more challenging question if the correct answer is towards the bottom of our answer choices. So let’s use this logic to our advantage, start with E, and work our way up.

Answer choice E: (4m-12)/[m(m-4)]

Substituting ‘5’ in place of ‘m,’ we get (4*5 – 12)/[5(5-4) = 8/5. That’s it! We’re done. The correct answer is E.

Takeaway: Keep reminding yourself that the GMAT (even with its new questions) is not designed to test what you know. While it is important to brush up on all of the fundamentals you acquired years before, the most successful test-takers will fluidly incorporate simple strategies when attacking complex questions, rather than simply grinding through longer calculations. Each new version of the Official Guide validates the wisdom of this approach.

**Official Guide question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council.*

The post Strategies for the New GMAT Questions that You Need to Know! appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post How to Tackle Evenly Spaced Sets on the GMAT appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>So then, how is it possible for a child – a genius, perhaps, but still a child – to do such an extensive computation in his head? The answer involves exploiting certain properties of evenly spaced sets. An evenly spaced set, as the name implies, is one in which the gap between each successive element in the set is equal. So a set consisting of consecutive integers would be evenly spaced, as would a set consisting of consecutive multiples of 2 or consecutive multiples of 3, etc.

It is always true of evenly spaced sets that the median – the middle term of the set – is equal to the mean, or arithmetic average, of the set. Moreover, the mean can be calculated by adding the high and the low terms of the set, and then dividing by 2. We can use this property in conjunction with the equation: Average * Number of Terms = Sum to calculate the sum of any large evenly spaced set.

In the case of the set of the integers from 1 to 100 inclusive, it works like this:

Average = (High + Low)/2 = (100 + 1)/2 = 101/2 = 50.5.

The Number of Terms = 100. Technically, the equation for finding the number of terms in an evenly spaced set is [(High-Low)/increment] + 1, but clearly, there are 100 terms between 1 and 100. Just remember, when using this formula, we want to add one to make sure we’re not leaving off the last term.

Average * Number = 50.5 * 100 = 5050.

Not too bad, even for a seven-year-old. (Note to those curious about the history of mathematics, this isn’t *exactly* how Gauss did the calculation, but it’s close enough.)

Now let’s see this concept in action on the GMAT:

*For any positive integer n, the sum of the first n positive integers equals (n(n+1))/2. What is the sum of all the even integers between 99 and 301? *

A) 10,000

B) 20,200

C) 22,650

D) 40,200

E) 45,150

Notice that we don’t have to bother with the formula they give us. The set of all evens from 99 to 301 inclusive will really be from 100 to 300, as those are the lowest and highest *even *terms of the set, respectively.

Average = (High + Low)/2 = (300 + 100)/2 = 400/2 = 200.

Number of Terms = [(High-Low)/increment] + 1 = [(300-100)/2] + 1 = 101. (Note: we divide by ‘2’ here because we only want even numbers, or multiples of 2. Thus, there is an increment of 2 between each successive term in the set.)

Average * Number = 200 * 101 = 20,200. The answer is B. Not bad.

*Great*, you think. *Now I can just go on autopilot and apply these formulas anytime I encounter a huge evenly spaced set.* But the GMAT doesn’t work like that. Sometimes we use a formula, but just as often, we’ll use logic, or we’ll pick a number, or we’ll work with the answer choices.

This cannot be repeated enough: Quantitative Reasoning is not a math test. It’s a test that requires some mathematical knowledge in order to make good decisions under pressure. Sometimes the best decision is doing little or no math at all.

Consider the following question:

*How many positive three-digit integers are divisible by both 3 and 4? *

A) 75

B) 128

C) 150

D) 225

E) 300

First, note that any number that is divisible by both 3 and 4 will be divisible by 12, as 12 is the least common multiple of 3 and 4. Perhaps you also noted that we’re dealing with an evenly spaced set here, and that, if the set consists of multiples of 12, the increment is clearly 12. But this question is very different from the previous one because we’re not required to calculate a sum. We just need to know how many multiples of 12 exist between 100 and 999.

If my increment is 12, I know I’ll be dividing by 12 at some point. But I can see that my (High – Low) will be at most (999 – 100) = 899. (Technically, our highest multiple of 12 in this set is 996 and our low term is 108, but there’s actually no need to discern this.) Clearly 899/12 will be less than 100, so there have to be fewer than 100 terms in the set. Now look at the answer choices. Only A is less than 100, so I’m done. I don’t have to finish the calculation.

Takeaway: You will be learning many useful formulas for the GMAT, but make sure you don’t use them blindly. Expect to mix formal algebra with the well-worn strategies of picking numbers and working with the answer choices. On the GMAT, flexibility and mental agility will always take precedence over rote memorization.

**GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council.*

The post How to Tackle Evenly Spaced Sets on the GMAT appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post Why is There “Math” in the GMAT Critical Reasoning Section? appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>Take percentages, for instance. We can understand percentage reasoning without doing much calculation. When I introduce this topic, I’ll offer a simple real-world example:

*In the 2014 playoffs, Lebron James made roughly 56% of his field goal attempts. In the 2015 playoffs, he made roughly 42% of his attempts. Therefore, he made fewer field goals in 2015 than in 2014.*

You don’t need to be an avid basketball fan to recognize the glaring logical flaw in this statement. To determine whether that percentage dip is meaningful, we have to know how many shot attempts he was taking. Because he took so many more shots in 2015 than in 2014, he ended up making more field goals in that year, when his field goal percentage was lower. The notion that a percentage isn’t terribly meaningful without knowing the percent of *what* is obvious to everyone.

What the GMAT will typically do, however, is to test the exact same concept using a scenario that we may not grasp quite as intuitively. Consider the following official argument:

*In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the last ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, these declines are likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses and therefore on the economy of Florida.*

*Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given?*

*People who moved from one state to another when they retired moved a greater distance, on average, last year than such people did ten years ago.**People were more likely to retire to North Carolina from another state last year than people were ten years ago.**The number of people who moved from one state to another when they retired has increased significantly over the past ten years.**The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was 10 years ago.**Florida attracts more people who move form one state to another when they retired than does any other state.*

The logic here may not be as obvious as the Lebron example, but it is, in fact, identical. The argument’s conclusion is that Florida’s economy will suffer negative consequences. The central premise is that of the people moving from one state to another, a smaller percentage are going to Florida now than were going to Florida ten years ago. The assumption is that a smaller *percentage* moving to Florida means *fewer people* moving to Florida.

This line of reasoning is no more valid than asserting that Lebron shooting a lower percentage in 2015 than in 2014 means he made fewer shots in 2015. Just as we needed to know if there was a change in the total number of shots Lebron was taking in order to evaluate whether the change in percentage was meaningful, we need to know if there was a change in the total number of people moving from one state to another in order to properly assess whether it’s meaningful that a smaller percentage are moving to Florida.

Let’s evaluate the answer choices one by one:

- The distance people moved doesn’t matter. Out of Scope. A is out.
- North Carolina isn’t relevant to what’s happening in Florida. Out of Scope. B is out.
- This is the logical equivalent of pointing out that Lebron took many more shots in 2015 than in 2014. If far more people are moving from one state to another now than were moving from one state to another ten years ago, it’s possible that more
*total people*are moving to Florida, even if a smaller*percentage*of movers are going to Florida. This looks good. - First, the number of people
*leaving*Florida has no bearing on whether a smaller percentage of people*moving*to Florida will have an impact on Florida’s economy. Moreover, we’re trying to weaken the idea that Florida’s economy will suffer. If more people are leaving Florida, it would strengthen the notion that Florida’s economy will endure negative consequences. That’s the opposite of what we want. D is out. - Tempting perhaps, but ultimately, irrelevant. Just because Lebron led the league in field goals made in both 2015 and 2014 (he didn’t, but play along), doesn’t mean he didn’t make fewer field goals in 2015. E is out.

The answer is C. If more people are moving from state to state, a lower percentage moving to Florida may not mean that fewer people are coming to Florida, just as Lebron’s dip in field goal percentage does not mean he was making fewer field goals if he was taking more shots.

Takeaway: The “math” concepts tested in Critical Reasoning are, in fact, logic concepts. By connecting the prompt to a more concrete real-world example, we make this logic far more intuitive and easily graspable when we encounter it on the test.

**Official Guide question courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council.*

The post Why is There “Math” in the GMAT Critical Reasoning Section? appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post How and When to Cancel Your GMAT Score appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>Now, immediately after taking the test and receiving your score, but before leaving the test center, you are given the option of reporting or canceling your scores. Knowing your unofficial score and having the ability to delete it can be a relief for some who don’t quite achieve their target score or prefer the school not see the score for other reasons.

Once you see your unofficial scores – Integrated Reasoning, Quantitative, Verbal, and Total – you will be given two minutes to decide whether to accept them. With the control in your own hands, it’s much less intimidating, but know that if you do not make a choice, your scores will be canceled! In other words, you must actively choose to submit your scores to be officially recorded.

If you do decide to cancel your scores, and have a change of heart later, you can actually have them reinstated within 60 days of the test date, but the indecision will cost you – $100 to be exact. After the 60 day window, scores cannot be reinstated, and in fact cannot even be reviewed ever again.

This new feature, while comforting to some, can also be nerve-wracking. How do you decide whether to submit or cancel? There are lots of rules of thumb, such as to cancel it if your score is more than 150 points lower than your target, or you feel your performance was particularly inhibited for some reason.

Don’t forget one thing: the admissions committees will only consider one score on your application, so even if you score poorly, but subsequently do well, only the good score will count. Sure, all your official scores within five years will be on the report, but schools truly only use the one you tell them to use – and will not hold against you any other scores.

One tip before sitting for the test now is to know exactly what score you’re willing to accept so you won’t find yourself making an impulsive decision in the heat of the moment with the clock counting down. Much like a bid on eBay, where you are best served by deciding your maximum bid in advance vs. in the final second of an auction, you will likely find yourself much more at ease if you make the cutoff score decision ahead of time.

One last thing, clients are asking often whether or not the schools will be able to see that you cancelled a score – the answer is no. Canceled scores will not be shown or otherwise indicated on your score reports.

Applying to business school? Call us at 1-800-925-7737 and speak with an MBA admissions expert today, or click here to take our Free MBA Admissions Profile Evaluation! As always, be sure to find us on Facebook,YouTube and Google+, and follow us on Twitter.

*Bryant Michaels has over 25 years of professional post undergraduate experience in the entertainment industry as well as on Wall Street with Goldman Sachs. He served on the admissions committee at the Fuqua School of Business where he received his MBA and now works part time in retirement for a top tier business school. He has been consulting with Veritas Prep clients for the past six admissions seasons. See more of his articles here.*

The post How and When to Cancel Your GMAT Score appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>The post 99th Percentile GMAT Score or Bust! Lesson 7: Read Like You Drive appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>First, take a look at lessons **1, 2, 3, 4, 5,** and **6**!

__Lesson Seven: __

Read Like You Drive: very few GMAT examinees will make mistakes driving to the GMAT test center, but most test-takers will make several Reading Comprehension mistakes once they’re there. As Ravi will discuss in this video, however, the two activities are much more similar than you realize: your job is to follow the signs. Certain keywords in Reading Comprehension passages will tell you when to yield, stop, turn, and pass with care, and if you’re following those signs properly you can proceed much faster than your self-imposed “speed limit” (most people read the passages far too slowly – stay out of the left lane!) and save valuable time for the questions themselves.

Are you studying for the GMAT? We have free online GMAT seminars running all the time. And, be sure to find us on Facebook, YouTube and Google+, and follow us on Twitter!

Want to learn more from Ravi? He’s taking his show on the road for a one-week Immersion Course in New York this summer, and he teaches frequently in our new Live Online classroom.

*By Brian Galvin*

The post 99th Percentile GMAT Score or Bust! Lesson 7: Read Like You Drive appeared first on Veritas Prep Blog.

]]>