A common complaint I hear from students is: “I’m not good at algebra”. Full disclosure, algebra isn’t my favorite topic either. Although algebra is a powerful tool for solving many questions on the GMAT, it is rarely the only means available to solve a given math problem.

The four most common strategies to get to the right answer are: algebra, conceptual thinking, picking numbers, and backsolving. Backsolving involves plugging in answer choices into the question to see whether it works. Picking numbers helps concretize abstract concepts with multiple variables (remember you can pick your friends and you can pick your nose but you can’t pick your friends’ nose). However the topic I’d like to focus on today is **conceptual thinking**.

The four strategies I mentioned above are not used arbitrarily in a vacuum; you can mix and match them to suit the problem at hand. Backsolving is often a good choice once you’ve done some algebra, or number picking can get you the right answer if you manipulate the equations provided. However, the strategy that will give you the greatest return is usually to start off with conceptual thinking. Look at the problem and think about what is being asked of you, as well as what information is provided that may guide your understanding. This tends to put you on the right path more often than not.

I often compare the GMAT to a game of Cranium (awesome board game). In Cranium, you must answer a question on a node, and then either take the fast track or the scenic path to the next node. As you can imagine, you can win the game even if you take the scenic path once or twice, but if you take it every time, you will assuredly run out of time. Similarly, on the GMAT, if you don’t know the best way to solve a question, it may take you 3 minutes to get a question right. This is fine if every second or third question is difficult, but if every question takes 3 minutes you’re only going to answer 25 questions out of 37.

Let’s look at a particularly challenging work/rate problem that is made much simpler by understanding what is going on:

Machine A takes 10 hours to complete a certain job and starts that job at 9AM. After one hour of working alone, machine A is joined by machine B and together they complete the job at 5PM. How long would it have taken machine B to complete the job if it had worked alone for the entire job?

(A) 15 hours

(B) 18 hours

(C) 20 hours

(D) 24 hours

(E) 35 hours

Using only algebra and the (hopefully) memorized formulae for Work problems (Work = Rate x Time or Rate = Work/Time), we can break this problem into 3 parts: Machine A alone from 9 AM to 10 AM (like a bad episode of 24), Machines A and B from 10 AM to 5 PM, and then the hypothetical Machine B alone. Let’s set up these three steps to see how we can solve this on the scenic path (ooh look to your left: a 3D dinosaur!).

Machine A takes 10 hours to do the job, so each hour it works finishes 1/10^{th} of the total job. From 9 AM to 10 AM, Machine A works alone, so at 10 AM, machine B kicks in and 1/10^{th} of the job is done. Ergo, 9/10^{th} of the job is left to complete for both machines.

From 10 AM to 5 PM, 7 hours pass, during which 9/10^{th} of the job gets completed. Thus we can calculate the rate of the machines working together: 9/10 = Rate_{A+B} x 7 hours. Rate_{A+B} = 9/70.

Since we know that Rate_{A} + Rate_{B} = Rate_{A+B} (i.e. rates are additive), we can leverage the fact that we know 2 of these 3 rates to find the third using basic fraction addition. 1/10 + Rate_{B} = 9/70. Putting them all on a common denominator: 7/70 + Rate_{B} = 9/70, so Rate_{B} = 2/70, or 1/35.

Now that we have B’s rate of 1/35, we can easily tell that it would take 35 hours to complete the entire job.

**The correct answer is (E).**

The algebraic solution works fine and gets you the right answer, but there are many moving parts to keep track of and many opportunities for mistakes. Can we get to the same answer but faster (aka the Max Power way) using conceptual understanding and avoid the scenic route (and the pack of velociraptors) entirely?

If machine A does 1/10^{th} of the work in an hour, and it works from 9 to 5 (what a way to make a living), then it works for 8 hours and accomplishes 80% of the job on its own. This means that machine B only accomplishes 20% of the job, and it does so in 7 hours (10 AM to 5 PM). If the machine does 1/5 of the job in 7 hours, it will take (7×5) 35 hours to complete 5/5 of the job. Answer choice E, using almost no math whatsoever, but rather by exploiting the logic of the question.

In general, if you see how to solve a problem via algebra and are confident you can solve it in 3 minutes or less, then by all means go for it. However, you can save some time if you really understand how questions are set up and what they are testing. It may not be possible to come up with a handy shortcut on test day because of nerves and stress, but during your preparation take a look at how problems are solved and see if you can find a more elegant solution. All roads lead to Rome, and the more routes you know, the less likely you are to get stuck in unfamiliar territory.

Plan on taking the GMAT soon? We have GMAT prep courses starting all the time. And, be sure to find us on Facebook and Google+, and follow us on Twitter!

*Ron Awad is a GMAT instructor for Veritas Prep based in Montreal, bringing you occasional tips and tricks for success on your exam. After graduating from McGill and receiving his MBA from Concordia, Ron started teaching GMAT prep and his Veritas Prep students have given him rave reviews ever since.*