Students often wonder why ‘x(x-3) < 0’ doesn’t imply ‘x < 0 or (x – 3) < 0’. In this post, we will discuss why and we will see what it actually implies. Also, we will look at how we can handle such questions quickly.

When you see ‘< 0’ or ‘> 0’, read it as ‘negative’ or ‘positive’ respectively. It will help you think clearly.

So the question we are considering today is:

**Question:** For what values of x will x(x-3) be negative?

**Solution:** Before we try to answer this question, think – when will the product of 2 numbers be negative? When one and only one of the factors is negative. Therefore, either x should be negative or (x – 3) should be negative, but not both. Let’s consider each case.

Case 1: x is negative and (x – 3) is positive

x < 0

and (x – 3) > 0 which implies x > 3

This is not possible. x cannot be less than 0 and greater than 3 at the same time. Hence this case gives us no appropriate values for x.

Case 2: x is positive and (x – 3) is negative

x > 0

and (x – 3) < 0 which implies x < 3

x must be greater than 0 but less than 3.

Therefore, the range of values for which this inequality will be satisfied is 0 < x < 3.

Will we have to do this every time we have multiple factors in an inequality? What will happen in case there are lots of factors? There is an easier way of handling such situations. I will first discuss the method and later explain the logic behind it.

Method: Say we have an inequality of the form (x – a)(x – b)(x – c) < 0. (For clarity, we will work with the example x(x – 3) < 0 discussed above.) This is how we solve for x:

Step 1: Make a number line and plot the points a, b and c on it. In our example, a = 0 and b = 3. The number line is divided into sections by these points. In our example, it is divided into 3 sections – greater than 3, between 0 and 3 and less than 0.

Step 2: Starting from the rightmost section, mark the sections with alternate positive and negative signs. The inequality will be positive in the sections where you have the positive signs and it will be negative in the sections where you have the negative signs.

Therefore, x(x – 3) will be negative in the section 0 < x < 3 and positive in the other two sections.

Hence, the values of x for which x(x – 3) < 0 is satisfied is 0 < x < 3.

Explanation: When we plot the points on the line, the number line is divided into various sections. Values of x in the right most section will always give you positive value of the expression. The reason for this is that if x > 3, all factors will be positive i.e. x and (x – 3), both will be positive.

When you jump to the next region i.e. between x = 0 and x = 3, the values of x will give you negative values for the entire expression because now, only one factor, (x – 3), will be negative. All other factors will be positive.

When you jump to the next region on the left where x < 0, expression will be positive again because now both factors x and (x – 3) are negative. The product of two negatives is positive so the expression will be positive again and so on…

Similarly, you can solve a question with any number of factors. Next week, we will look at how to easily handle numerous complications that can arise.

*Karishma, a Computer Engineer with a keen interest in alternative Mathematical approaches, has mentored students in the continents of Asia, Europe and North America. She teaches the **GMAT** for Veritas Prep and regularly participates in content development projects such as this blog!*

## 12 thoughts on “Quarter Wit, Quarter Wisdom: Inequalities with Multiple Factors”

Comments are closed.

Amazinggggggg :)))

Thanks and thanks again

Thanks. We will discuss various questions based on the same concept but with small variations in the next few weeks.

Truly Good One, Karishma !

I do have the below query:

Applying your method, What would be the range for x for the following:

(x/3) + (3/x) >2

Let me re-state the question:

x/3 + 3/x – 2 > 0

(x^2 + 9 – 6x)/3x > 0

(x – 3)^2/3x > 0

It is your regular question now. Can you now answer it?

(Answer is x > 0 but x cannot be 3)

Got it! You mean the range would be 0<x3 right?

But, if i am plotting the points in the number line graph, for x>3, there is a -ve sign as below:

………-ve…….0……….+ve……..3….-ve

so that the number greater than zero is positive.

Please clarify…

Little correction in my post above: the range of x would be : 0<x3

Looks like there is some problem in display of the post:

It is :

0<x3

Karishma,

I will now write it in words as the inequality range is not displaying in the above posts of mine:

Range of x would be x is greater than 0 and less than 3 or, x is greater than 3. Right?

Yes, the range is x > 0, x not equal to 3

or you can write it as

0 < x 3

When the factor is a square you do not include it on the number line. You consider it only while writing out the range.

Check this post for this concept: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/07/quarter-wit-quarter-wisdom-inequalities-with-complications-part-ii/

Got it, Karishma !

In the aforesaid link, the range x ? 5/2 or x ? 6 but x ? 0 (x is less than equal to 5/2 or x is greater than equal to 6 , but x is not equal to zero ) can be written as ,

x< 0

or,

0<x ? 5/2

or,

x ? 6

(x is Less than 0 , or, x is Greater than 0 & Less than equal to 5/2 , or , x is Greater than equal to 6)

Did i get this right ?

Yes, this is correct.

Thanks!